Adaptación y validación de la Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) al castellano / Adaptation and validation of a Spanish-language version of the Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS)

Introducción: La Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) es una escala diseñada para facilitar la estadificación clínica y la evaluación de la progresión de pacientes con demencia frontotemporal (DFT). Objetivo: Realizar un estudio multicéntrico de adaptación y validación al castellano de la FTD-FRS. Metodología: La adaptación se realizó mediante 2 procesos de traducción y retrotraducción inglés-español español-inglés y se verificó con los autores originales. El proceso de validación se llevó a cabo en una muestra consecutiva de pacientes diagnosticados de DFT. Se evaluó la consistencia interna, se determinó la unidimensionalidad con el método Rasch, se analizaron la validez de constructo y la validez discriminante, y se calculó el grado de acuerdo entre la Clinical Dementia Rating scale y la FTD-FRS para los casos con DFT. Resultados: Se incluyeron 60 pacientes con DFT. La puntuación media de la FTD-FRS fue de 12,1 puntos (DE = 6,5; rango = 2-25) mostrando diferencias intergrupos (F = 120,3; gl = 3; p < 0,001). El α de Cronbach = 0,897, el análisis de componentes principales de los residuos produjo un aceptable autovalor para 5 contrastes (1,6-2,7) y una varianza respecto al origen del 36,1%. La FTD-FRS correlacionó con el Mini-mental test (r = 0,572; p < 0,001) y capacidad funcional (DAD; r = 0,790; p < 0,001). La FTD-FRS correlacionó significativamente con la Clinical Dementia Rating scale (r = −0,641; p < 0,001) pero se observó variabilidad entre la distribución de la gravedad, siendo valorados como más leves según la Clinical Dementia Rating scale que con la FTD-FRS (kappa = 0,055). Conclusiones: El estudio de traducción y validación al español mostró resultados de validez y unidimensionalidad (gravedad) satisfactorios para el uso de la FTD-FRS en el estudio de la gravedad en pacientes con DFT (AU)

Introduction: The Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) is a tool designed to aid with clinical staging and assessment of the progression of frontotemporal dementia (FTD-FRS). Objective: Present a multicentre adaptation and validation study of a Spanish version of the FRS. Methodology: The adapted version was created using 2 translation-back translation processes (English to Spanish, Spanish to English) and verified by the scale's original authors. We validated the adapted version in a sample of consecutive patients diagnosed with FTD. The procedure included evaluating internal consistency, testing unidimensionality with the Rasch model, analysing construct validity and discriminant validity, and calculating the degree of agreement between the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR) and FTD-FRS for FTD cases. Results: The study included 60 patients with DFT. The mean score on the FRS was 12.1 points (SD = 6.5; range, 2-25) with inter-group differences (F = 120.3; df = 3; P < .001). Cronbach's alpha was 0.897 and principal component analysis of residuals delivered an acceptable eigenvalue for 5 contrasts (1.6-2.7) and 36.1% raw variance. FRS was correlated with the Mini-mental State Examination (r = 0.572; P < .001) and functional capacity (DAD; r = 0.790; P < .001). FTD-FRS also showed a significant correlation with CDR (r = −0.641; P < .001), but we did observe variability in the severity levels; cases appeared to be less severe according to the CDR than when measured with the FTD-FRS (kappa = 0.055). Conclusions: This process of validating the Spanish translation of the FTD-FRS yielded satisfactory results for validity and unidimensionality (severity) in the assessment of patients with FTD (AU)

Adaptation and validation of a Spanish-language version of the Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS). / Adaptación y validación de la Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) al castellano.

INTRODUCTION: The Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) is a tool designed to aid with clinical staging and assessment of the progression of frontotemporal dementia (FTD-FRS). OBJECTIVE: Present a multicentre adaptation and validation study of a Spanish version of the FRS. METHODOLOGY: The adapted version was created using 2 translation-back translation processes (English to Spanish, Spanish to English) and verified by the scale's original authors. We validated the adapted version in a sample of consecutive patients diagnosed with FTD. The procedure included evaluating internal consistency, testing unidimensionality with the Rasch model, analysing construct validity and discriminant validity, and calculating the degree of agreement between the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR) and FTD-FRS for FTD cases. RESULTS: The study included 60 patients with DFT. The mean score on the FRS was 12.1 points (SD=6.5; range, 2-25) with inter-group differences (F=120.3; df=3; P<.001). Cronbach's alpha was 0.897 and principal component analysis of residuals delivered an acceptable eigenvalue for 5 contrasts (1.6-2.7) and 36.1% raw variance. FRS was correlated with the Mini-mental State Examination (r=0.572; P<.001) and functional capacity (DAD; r=0.790; P<.001). FTD-FRS also showed a significant correlation with CDR (r=-0.641; P<.001), but we did observe variability in the severity levels; cases appeared to be less severe according to the CDR than when measured with the FTD-FRS (kappa=0.055). CONCLUSIONS: This process of validating the Spanish translation of the FTD-FRS yielded satisfactory results for validity and unidimensionality (severity) in the assessment of patients with FTD.